Archive for the ‘Risk Management’ Category

Teams needs to be clear about the desired program outcome and expected results

Wednesday, February 9th, 2011

I will contend that many programs and projects struggle because program and/or project teams do not have a clear picture of the intended program outcome and their role in delivering the desired outcome.  This is especially true with IT projects utilizing new and emerging technologies.

This phenomenon has many early warning symptoms.  For example,

1.       Early on in the program, each member of the project team cannot articulate the intended program outcome, why it is important to the organization or the value they will contribute to the program’s and/or project’s success.

2.       Team members cannot articulate what needs to be done.  Team view is, “We will figure it out as we go along.”

3.       New technology has never been implemented in a large complex environment and, therefore, technology vendor assists with defining WBS/WBS Dictionary definition or risk event identification – often this definition is what the vendor can (or wants to) do and not what is needed by the program

You may have observed other symptoms, but I think you get the picture.

So the question becomes, why is this important?  It is important because when program/project teams are not clear on the outcomes and their roles, projects stall.  When programs/projects stall, the budget is over-run and key milestones are missed.  Very often the program/project scope is narrowed to deliver the project with some benefit earlier than the newly projected delayed end date.  In all cases, the program/project does not meet the approved business case.

As the program and/or project leader, you need to be clear and you MUST make sure the program/project team is clear on all aspects of the work effort.  Specifically, you need to be clear on the outcome(s) and expected results, the purpose of the outcome, the skills required to achieve the outcome, and how the outcome/results are going to be achieved.

With respect to your team(s), you need to make sure your team is clear on the outcome and why the outcome is important.  Each team member also needs to be clear on the deliverables expected from them and their due dates.  You also need to ask each team member what dependencies they have on other team members’ deliverables and/or intermediate work products.

Short of your program/project team(s) having this clear picture, you are putting your program/project at risk (e.g., cost, schedule, quality, etc.) of not achieving the approved business case.  This communication should be communicated to the team during the initial kick-off meeting and reinforced at least monthly during regularly scheduled team meetings.

Two recommendations:

First, to address existing stalled projects, take the time to make sure your team has a clear vision of the intended outcome and its role in achieving that outcome.  Your team should be refocused on the intended outcome and will offer up ideas on how to get “unstuck.”

Second, to help prevent stalls on new programs/projects, communicate the desired outcomes, program/project purpose, and expectations during the kick-off meeting.  In addition, as you bring aboard new team members, make sure  each team member is clear on the program/project intended outcome(s) and their role in the achievement of those outcomes.  You will be glad you did.

Share and enjoy this Hendon Group article:
  • Print
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Mixx
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Add to favorites
  • LinkedIn
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • Yahoo! Buzz

Posted in Initiating Process, Leadership, Planning Process, Portfolio Leadership, Program Leadership, Project Leadership, Risk Management, Troubled Projects | No Comments »

Tip of the Month – October 2010

Monday, October 4th, 2010

Issue Management

There is an old saying, “If you take care of the mole hills, the mountains will take care of themselves.”  Many program and project leaders go into crisis management mode unnecessarily.  Reason – frequently the leadership team, program, or project manager is too busy fighting other program and/or project-related fires.

If this sounds like insanity, you are right.  Program and project issues are like accounts receivable…they get worse with age.  Address small issues promptly before they become big issues.  You will find if you follow this tip, you will have more time to focus on ensuring your customer has a positive experience throughout the program/project life cycle.

Share and enjoy this Hendon Group article:
  • Print
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Mixx
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Add to favorites
  • LinkedIn
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • Yahoo! Buzz

Posted in Issue Management, Risk Management, Tip of the Month | No Comments »

Focus on the Problem; Focus on the Solution; Don’t kick your client / business partner when they are down

Monday, June 21st, 2010

Many years ago, when I was a new First Line Manager, a client had a very nasty technical infrastructure problem that required a team of subject matter experts to resolve.  During that same time, our company was going through the transition of trying to take the letter “R” out of “Free” with respect to support services.

The new corporate direction…support services are no longer free.  The client contacted us and told one of my team members about their problem.  Before the 1.5 hour one way drive to tackle the problem, the client was told the support services assistance would be billable.  Before we understood the problem, we had already communicated to the client they were going to pay for the support…In other words, we kicked them while they were down (literally).

Needless to say, the client’s leadership team was not happy about our conversation.  The technical team went out to work the client’s technical issue and after a few days, the problem was resolved.  The client was happy the problem was resolved but, they were extremely irritated about the “fee support services” discussion before the root cause of the problem and more importantly, effort to resolve the problem was understood.  Our business relationship was strained for quite some time afterwards.

Shortly after we solved the problem, I had a one-on-one, face to face meeting with the client and he gave me some very sage advice.  His guidance was this…“we don’t have a problem paying for help – our problem was your organization appeared more focused on telling us we had to pay for your help than you were fixing our problem”.  He also told me, “If you want to be a true partner, when we are in trouble, focus on getting our problem fixed and then let’s have the conversation on who should pay and for what”.  His comments echoed an old saying, “your client does not care how much you know until they know how much you care”.

I have always remembered the conversation and my client’s advice could not be more relevant with respect to the April 2010 British Petroleum (BP) Oil Spill in the Gulf of Mexico.  BP is a business partner of the United States of America.  BP Oil provides fuel and lubricants that propel America.  BP also provides jobs and community service projects in the geographies they serve around the globe.

The Program Leader who will lead BP and the U.S.A. out of the oil spill challenge will do so if they:

  • Understand each of the core issues and the key parties competing interests on each of the core issues
  • Resolve each major issue as a project
  • Identify and align the right skilled resources where they can deliver the greatest value to drive success
  • Manage / Lead the effort as a integrated Program

So the next time you have a large client or, business partner, with a very large complex problem, focus on the problem; focus on the solution; and don’t kick your client when they are down by making a big deal about who pays until you understand the problem, its root cause and how the problem is going to be resolved.

Have you ever put your client and/or business partner in this situation?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...

© Copyright 2006 – 2010 Hendon Group, Inc.  All Rights Reserved.

Share and enjoy this Hendon Group article:
  • Print
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Mixx
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Add to favorites
  • LinkedIn
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • Yahoo! Buzz

Posted in Communications Management, Leadership, Risk Management, Troubled Projects | No Comments »